The Myth of Philippine Bankruptcy and “Chinese Debt Slavery” – OpEd – Eurasia Review
In May 2017, Forbes published a column that claimed that “Philippines new debt of $167 billion could Balloon at 452 billion dollars: China will benefit.” It was written by Anders Corr, who was presented as an “independent” geopolitical risk analyst.
“Over 10 years,” Corr boldly predicted, “this could inflate the Philippines’ debt-to-GDP ratio by up to 296%, the highest in the world.” Fueled by expensive loans from China,” he said, “Dutertenomics will put the Philippines in virtual debt bondage.”
At the time, I argued that Corr’s prediction was silly and up to 240-250 percentage points. Yet it has been widely quoted both internationally and in the Philippines.
Stupid assumptions, silly predictions
Around 2016/7, Philippine authorities, including the Bureau of Treasury (BoT), expected debt to decline slightly between 2017 and 2022.
In retrospect, the devastation of the pandemic sent debt levels skyrocketing around the world. But has the Philippines’ debt-to-GDP ratio soared to 300%, as Corr predicted? No, this is not the case. It is now around 60% of GDP and sustainable (Figure 1).
Figure 1 Philippine public debt, 2016-22 (% of GDP)
Does China account for the bulk of this debt, as Corr predicted? No, this is not the case. Over 70% of the debt is domestic. Does China Dominate Foreign Debt? No, this is not the case.
Eight foreign creditors account for three-quarters of all the Philippines’ external debt. Dominating a third of this debt, Japan is in a class by itself. It is followed by the United States, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Even Taiwan is a larger creditor than China whose role in external debt is around 5% of the total (Figure 2).
Figure 2 Main foreign creditors (in millions of dollars, December 2021) *
So Corr’s “predictions” for 2017 have absolutely nothing to do with economic realities. His Forbes comment was completely wrong, as I argued half a decade ago.
By its own numbers, Corr is by almost 240 percentage points.
Experts for geopolitical ax trades
Anders Corr has a very special background. Most of its customers are tied to the Pentagon, its military allies and defense contractors. And he was an associate of Booz Allen Hamilton in Hawaii, like Ed Snowden when he was still working for the CIA.
Additionally, Corr served half a decade in US military intelligence. He conducted “research” for the US Army in Afghanistan, US Pacific Command and US Special Operations Command Pacific. By his own testimony, he seems to specialize in destabilization efforts. Hence its operations and customers in the Philippines, Taiwan, Pakistan and, more recently, Ukraine.
In 2017, Corr did not provide any evidence to support his claims of Philippine claim. Still, the comment was quickly recycled in Western media. Even though Corr was later fired from Forbes.
When investment analysts commit such egregious failures in the markets, they are usually fired, banned or, in the case of a criminal act, fined and detained. This was not the case with Corr.
Despite dire screenings, Corr continues to be used as an “expert” by major international media, such as Bloomberg, Fox, CNBC, New York Times, Nikkei Review, Al Jazeera and UPI. In a 2022 report, the Congressional Research Service still describes Corr as a expert on the South China Sea and “Chinese strategies”.
Leading Filipino observers have proven even more gullible.
How Corr’s Fake News Prevails in PH
When Forbes published Corr’s rant, major network GMA News boldly headlined: “CHINA WILL BENEFIT: Duterte’s P8.2T infra program could force PHL into “slavery”.”
Rappler rushed to interview communist leader Jose Maria Sison, who remains in the Netherlands and has been classified as a “person supporting terrorism” by the United States since 2002. Sison claimed “Chinese loans could trick PH into giving up West PH Sea.” Rappler used a PhD candidate to tell how the country ‘fell in love’ The infamous Chinese debt trap.”
Rappler was funded by secretive American billionaire Pierre Omidyear who cooperated with the State Department and the National Endowment for Democracy.
ABS-CBN News, another major news network, often publishes Corr’s comments warning that the country is “risking its sovereignty with loans from China”, portrays him as a Covid lockdown expert”, and recently quoted his rants that the Ukraine crisis will cause China to “tighten” its grip in Asia.
ABS-CBN is owned by the Lopez family, a powerful Filipino dynasty.
Philippine Star published an op-ed suggesting that the Duterte government’s infrastructure building spree would be “shank Philippines to China.” Federico D. Pascual Jr. quoted Corr in a verbatim warning that “Duterte apologists” cannot dismiss Forbes/Corr truths.
The principal owner of the Star is MediaQuest Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based First Pacific-controlled telecommunications company PLDT; which, in turn, is chaired by Indonesian oligarch Anthoni Salim and led by Manuel Pangilingan, a critic of Duterte and China, like his former foreign secretary Albert Del Rosario.
Subsequently, the Stratbase ADR Institute in Rosario published a research paper on the Chinese BRI’s globalization warning about the “project Chinese investment in the Philippines.” For ADRi, Corr’s piece proved the point.
These outlets share a common denominator: they depend on foreign funding or belong to the Filipino elite 1%, or both. Curiously, their Corr promotion fosters the perception that journalistic integrity is not their primary goal.
Corr’s predictions have no predictive power. His activities are more reminiscent of those of “economic hitmen”; that is, “highly paid professionals who cheat countries around the world with trillions of dollars,” as John Perkins put it.
The real question is this: why are such economic hitmen still used as “independent analysts” by some of the most powerful international media in the world?
And why does the Filipino media owned by foreign interests and/or domestic oligarchs continue to promote Corr’s stories, knowing full well that these fatal fictions are fake news?
The original commentary was published by The Manila Times on April 18, 2022